We must reverse the ‘outcome oriented' educational monster we have unleashed Cathy Davidson
-
Loading... - LISA KENDRICK
- 04 Jan 2021
- 1151 Views
- 0 Like
- 0 Comment
We are in the midst of a serious epidemic of scapegoating our youth. Enter the search term “millennial” and one is presented with a flood of punditry that diagnoses college students as “excellent sheep” who are so gobsmacked by Google and so “spoon-fed” by doting parents that they can no longer cope with difficulty or perform complex mental operations. I disagree. With over three decades as a college professor, I believe it’s time educators proposed a more accurate pathology of the problems facing youth today and offered a better cure.
First, let’s reconsider who these supposedly coddled students really are. When I ask beginning students when they first realised they were creatures of history, not simply independent actors, they routinely name the 2008 global financial crisis. They would have been 10 or 12 when the world’s leaders appeared on their TV screen to deliver the unprecedented message that the fortunes of corporations, nations, and individuals had vanished overnight. Fast forward to the present and the United Nation’s International Labour Organization (ILO) warning that some 75% of the world’s workers are now employed in temporary, contingent jobs or in unpaid family jobs.
Millennials and their younger siblings know difficulty. They were reared on it. No college generation in recent times has faced greater global challenges or an educational system more in need of redesign to prepare them for these challenges. Because of an irresponsible older generation’s abdication of support for higher education as a public good, students in many countries today pay higher tuition and leave with greater debt than ever before. No generation since the second world war has had to face more real and present danger from resurgent fascism, the possibility of nuclear holocaust, or environmental collapse, compounded by powerful leaders determined to deny these realities. Students are warned that the “robots are coming” but offered an educational system that seems designed not to combat the robots but to turn students into poor facsimiles of them.
Increasingly, we are shrinking educational opportunities for our youth worldwide, robbing them of the creativity of the arts, the critical thinking of the humanities and social sciences, and reducing all knowledge to test scores, despite repeated workforce studies stressing the importance of deep learning. The trend is to use standardised tests as the entrance to university and therefore to a middle-class future, even though we have ample research, extending back to the Hermann Ebbinghaus memory experiments of the 1880s, about the evanescence of knowledge crammed for the purpose of test-taking.
It’s not just students. Throughout the world, teachers and professors are increasingly judged not by how well their students think or what they understand in deep and complex ways but how well they do on these tests. So “teaching to the test” is a survival mechanism for teachers too. It’s oversimplification all the way down.
In short, the “problem” with university students today isn’t the students but the educational liabilities we’ve saddled them with. We have schooled them to believe formal education is where intellectual creativity and complexity go to die.
Yet, in my experience, I find that students today remain admirably resilient, clear-eyed, and even optimistic about their ability to face and solve the difficulties of the world they have inherited. Why is my experience so different from that of many of colleagues? One reason is that I have restructured my courses to support and challenge students not as content memorisers but as content creators – a skill they have mastered outside of school and that is far more predictive of future success than test scores. We know, from surveys conducted by the world’s library associations, that this generation does more voluntary, non-required imaginative reading than any other since surveys began after the second world war. Publishers would be in bad shape without a category of literature that barely existed in pre-internet days, they young adult section. We know how much time they spend on line interacting, modding, and remixing content. These are useful skills in the world we live in so I build my courses around them, rather than dismissing them as superficial.
Whether I am teaching a traditional literature course or one focusing on new technologies, digital literacy, and information systems (my two areas of specialisation), I deconstruct the passivity and mindlessness of traditional schooling and challenge my students to take responsibility for their learning by using active, engaged learning principles from Maria Montessori,John Dewey, Paulo Freire, bell hooks and Audre Lorde.
My students work hard, but they see that they are learning skills they will rely on long after the course grade is in and the diploma issued. They take the lead in designing our syllabus, using one another and the internet as constant resources to collaboratively work through challenging problems together. They analyse and even design our assessment methods and conduct rigorous peer review of one another’s work before approving it for publication to an open, free website. They take pride in making an original contribution to public knowledge.
As a lifelong educator, I believe the problem of students today lies in us not in our youth. It is our job to reverse this “outcome oriented” educational monster we have created. We need to design a “new education” that encourages students not just to cram for reductive tests but to succeed in the harrowing world we have bequeathed to them.
